AI that connects questions to your business knowledge
An example of source-backed answers, knowledge retrieval and continuity of support.
Explore the workThe five steps in order, why step one is not the chatbot, and what to measure so you know whether it worked.
Most support automation projects start by choosing a chatbot. That is step four. Starting there is why so many of them get switched off within a quarter.
Take the last 200 conversations and group them. You will usually find that a handful of question types cover most of the volume, and that a good share of them are not questions at all: they are people asking for the status of something. Those two groups need different solutions, and one of them is not a chatbot.
An assistant grounded in stale documentation repeats your errors very confidently. If the answer to a frequent question is not written down anywhere correct, writing it is the actual work — and it improves your human support too.
Checking an order status is different from changing it. Read-only actions are safe; anything with a side effect gets bounded in code and, where it has consequences, goes through human approval. Never bound it in the prompt alone.
Grounded in your documentation, citing the source, and with an explicit "I do not have that" when retrieval comes back empty. Silence is better than invention.
A person should receive the conversation and a summary, not a bare notification. The most common failure of support automation is not a wrong answer: it is trapping someone who needed a human three messages ago.
Web chat, WhatsApp and email each bring their own expectations and handoff rules. Launch on the channel where most of your repetitive questions already arrive, measure it, and only then add the next one.
Decide what the assistant may see, what it stores and for how long. Conversation logs are useful for improving answers, but they contain customer data: limit who can read them and do not send personal details to analytics.
A deflection percentage. It depends on your ticket mix and your documentation, and any figure quoted before reading your tickets is invented.
A valid answer with sources, a question with insufficient support, and a handoff to a person.
An example of source-backed answers, knowledge retrieval and continuity of support.
Explore the workGive customers useful answers grounded in your business information. We build assistants with source retrieval, connected tools and a clear handoff to your team.
Does your team answer the same questions or copy data from emails? We build agents that consult your knowledge, extract information and act in your systems, with clear rules and review where needed.
We turn repetitive tasks into workflows that read information, validate data and take actions in your tools. Your team can follow what happened and handle exceptions.
Send us the question types you see most. We will tell you which are worth automating and which need a process fix instead.